April 19, 2007

Table of Contents

LATEST SUMMARIES

ATTORNEY'S FEES, CIVIL PROCEDURE, CIVIL RIGHTS, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, DEBT COLLECTION
• Revis v. Meldrum

CIVIL PROCEDURE, GOVERNMENT LAW, PROPERTY LAW & REAL ESTATE, PUBLIC UTILITIES, REMEDIES
• City of Cookeville v. Upper Cumberland Elec. Membership Corp.

IMMIGRATION LAW
• Sarr v. Gonzales

You May FREELY Redistribute This E-Mail in Whole
To view the full-text of cases you must sign in to FindLaw.com.

LATEST SUMMARIES

ATTORNEY'S FEES, CIVIL PROCEDURE, CIVIL RIGHTS, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, DEBT COLLECTION
Revis v. Meldrum, No. 06-5197, 06-5399
In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action brought against persons and entities involved in executing certain writs of execution against plaintiff, it was alleged that a seizure of his residence and a search of his person pursuant to the writs violated his constitutional rights. Summary judgment and other rulings for defendants are affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded where: 1) although the underlying litigation and judgment did not provide constitutionally adequate process for plaintiff's eviction, defendant-deputy was nevertheless entitled to qualified immunity; 2) deputy was also entitled to qualified immunity on a Fourth Amendment claim; 3) a verbal exchange did not amount to a search for Fourth Amendment purposes; 4) there was no "deliberate indifference" as to a failure to properly train the deputy; 5) claims against private-party defendants failed as their actions could not be attributed to the state; and 6) an attorney's fees award required reconsideration in light of the circuit court's findings. Read more...

CIVIL PROCEDURE, GOVERNMENT LAW, PROPERTY LAW & REAL ESTATE, PUBLIC UTILITIES, REMEDIES
City of Cookeville v. Upper Cumberland Elec. Membership Corp., No. 05-5886; 06-5363
In a dispute over an element of compensation that Tennessee law requires when a city annexes territory and exercises its right to purchase electric utility property within the annexed territory, an order requiring city to pay reintegration costs of almost $6 million is affirmed as it was legally proper and not clearly erroneous. However, an order enjoining the city from providing electric service in the annexed area, pending resolution of the compensation dispute, is reversed as it improperly expanded the scope of the previous compensation order. Read more...

IMMIGRATION LAW
Sarr v. Gonzales, No. 05-4558
Petition for review of a denial of petitioner's requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and related relief is denied over claims that: 1) he proved by sufficient evidence that he had suffered past persecution in Senegal and that country conditions have not changed sufficiently to alleviate the threat of future persecution if he were to be returned there; and 2) he was denied due process by an IJ's adverse credibility finding and by the BIA's refusal to adjudicate certain of his requests for relief. Read more...