Table of ContentsLATEST SUMMARIESAdministrative Law, Immigration Law
• Padilla-Romero v. Holder
View FindLaw's new Case Summary Blog for U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.FindLaw's case summaries are copyrighted material and are not intended for republication without prior approval. You may, however, freely redistribute this e-mail in its entirety. To view the full-text of cases you must sign in to FindLaw.com.
LATEST SUMMARIESAdministrative Law, Immigration Law
Padilla-Romero v. Holder
In a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision affirming the Immigration Judge's (IJ) decision holding petitioner statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal, the petition is denied where the inclusion in8 U.S.C. section 1229b(b)(1)(A) of an express requirement that an alien's period of continuous physical presence be "immediately preceding" the application for cancellation of removal did not undermine the court of appeals' interpretation of section 1229b(a)(1), because that section, when read as a whole and in the context of the definition of "lawfully admitted for permanent residence," was sufficiently clear that such additional text would be superfluous. Read more...
Feedback
We value your comments! Please take a moment to tell us what you think by sending us an e-mail. | Subscription Information
Click here to subscribe to a FindLaw Newsletter. To unsubscribe, click here. | Advertising Information
For more information about advertising in FindLaw Newsletters, click here. |
| 
