April 16-20, 2007

Table of Contents

PATENT CASES

• Triple Tee Golf, Inc. v. Nike, Inc.
• Intamin, Ltd. v. Magnetar Techs., Corp.
• State of Texas v. Holland

You May FREELY Redistribute This E-Mail in Whole
To view the full-text of cases you must sign in to FindLaw.com.

U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, April 17, 2007
Triple Tee Golf, Inc. v. Nike, Inc., No. 05-10934, 05-11442
In a suit brought against Nike and others involving claims of misappropriation of trade secrets by certain golf clubs, summary judgment for Nike and related rulings are reversed in part where the district court erroneously disregarded the relevance of certain undisclosed patent applications by Nike to its evidentiary orders that laid the foundation for the grant of summary judgment. Read more...

U.S. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, April 18, 2007
Intamin, Ltd. v. Magnetar Techs., Corp., No. 05-1546, 05-1579
In a patent dispute involving a magnetic braking system for amusement park rides such as drop towers and roller coasters, summary judgment of non-infringement in favor of defendant is vacated and remanded where the district court erred in construing the term "intermediary" and a limitation regarding the conducting rail. Read more...

Supreme Court of Texas, April 20, 2007
State of Texas v. Holland, No. 05-0292
A takings claim is not the proper avenue for a patentholder who performs services under contract with the state to assert patent rights when the state's use is pursuant to colorable contract rights. Read more...