April 16-20, 2007

Table of Contents

TAX LAW CASES

• Pac. Fisheries Inc. v. US
• Florida Dep't of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc.
• FleetBoston Fin. Corp. v. US
• Crawfish Processors Alliance v. US

You May FREELY Redistribute This E-Mail in Whole
To view the full-text of cases you must sign in to FindLaw.com.

U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, April 17, 2007
Pac. Fisheries Inc. v. US, No. 04-35897, 04-35899
In a dispute in which taxpayers sought attorneys' fees from the government for their pursuit of two federal court petitions to quash third-party summonses by the IRS, a ruling for the government is affirmed where, although the district court erred in placing the burden to prove lack of substantial justification on taxpayers, as a matter of law, the government met its burden of proving its position was substantially justified. The government's prelitigation conduct could not be factored into a determination of whether its position in the judicial proceeding "was substantially justified" under the applicable statute. Read more...

U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, April 18, 2007
Florida Dep't of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc., No. 06-13759
District court's affirmance of bankruptcy court's decision granting stamp-tax exemption on the sale of assets is affirmed over claim that the district court erred in holding that the 11 U.S.C. section 1146(c) stamp-tax exemption may apply to pre-confirmation asset sales. Read more...

U.S. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, April 19, 2007
FleetBoston Fin. Corp. v. US, No. 06-5032
A judgment finding that corporate taxpayer had to pay interest on the full extent of certain deficiencies is affirmed where the trial court correctly concluded that an amount of tax is "paid" within the meaning of 26 U.S.C. section 6601(a) only by funds in the taxpayer's account for that tax year, and that the interest attributable to the underpayments resulting from credit elects for 1984 and 1985 was properly calculated for each taxable year from the March 15 due dates for the succeeding years' income taxes. Read more...

U.S. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, April 20, 2007
Crawfish Processors Alliance v. US, No. 2006-1501
In an appeal involving an Antidumping Duty Order imposed against freshwater crawfish tail meat imported from China, a scope ruling that crawfish etouffee is not included within the scope of the order is affirmed as substantial evidence supported the determination because the essential character of the crawfish tail meat in etouffee was altered or "substantially transformed" by its preparation process. Read more...