April 18, 2007

Table of Contents

LATEST SUMMARIES

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, EVIDENCE, SENTENCING
• Flowers v. State of Texas
• Roberts v. State of Texas

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, HABEAS CORPUS, SENTENCING
• Ex parte Cruzata

You May FREELY Redistribute This E-Mail in Whole
To view the full-text of cases you must sign in to FindLaw.com.

LATEST SUMMARIES

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, EVIDENCE, SENTENCING
Flowers v. State of Texas, No. 1081-06
A sentence for driving while intoxicated (DWI) is affirmed where, regardless of whether a computer printout is the functional equivalent of a judgment for all purposes, the evidence was sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant had a prior DWI conviction as alleged in an enhancement paragraph. Read more...

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, EVIDENCE, SENTENCING
Roberts v. State of Texas, No. 75,051
A conviction and death sentence for capital murder is affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) the factual sufficiency of the evidence; 2) evidentiary issues; 3) ineffective assistance of counsel; 4) prosecutorial misconduct; 5) jury instructions; 6) closing argument; and 7) challenges to the death penalty. Read more...

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, HABEAS CORPUS, SENTENCING
Ex parte Cruzata, No. 75,513
An application for habeas relief challenging a sentence for indecency with a child is dismissed as a claim of error regarding the sentence could not be heard via habeas corpus because defendant had failed to raise it on direct appeal. Read more...