Weekly corporate governance, corporation, white collar, mergers and acquisitions, and antitrust law case summaries, from FindLaw.com.
View this email in your browser
Corporate Legal Issues
Digest for Week of February 9th, 2017

Corporate Law Blog Posts & Case Summaries

Blog Posts:
Case Summaries:

Corporate Law Blog Posts

With Two Strokes of a Pen, Trump Begins Unwinding Financial Regulations

Casey C. Sullivan, Esq.
February 6, 2017
President Trump met with Wall Street executives on Friday, then emerged to sign an executive order that could be used to roll back Dodd-Frank regulations. The president also signed a memorandum instructing the Treasury Department to reexamine the new...
Keep Reading

Will Surge in Mergers Bring More Lawsuits?

William Vogeler, Esq.
February 3, 2017
As President Trump's economic policies take shape, observers predict a surge in mergers this year. It may also bring back merger litigation, which slowed down in the last years of the Obama administration. Trump's new chairman of the Federal...
Keep Reading

Facebook Loses $500 Million Verdict in Virtual Reality Case

William Vogeler, Esq.
February 2, 2017
Maybe Mark Zuckerberg should have taken the blue pill. The "blue pill" reference comes from The Matrix, a sci-fi movie in which one character bemoans the day he realized the virtual world was not real. Zuckerberg, stunned by a...
Keep Reading

Corporate Law Case Summaries

In re ACTOS End-Payor Antitrust Litigation

February 8, 2017
Intellectual Property, Patent, Dispute Resolution & Arbitration, Antitrust & Trade Regulation
(United States Second Circuit) - In a complaint allege that defendants delayed competitors from marketing generic versions of the diabetes drug ACTOS by falsely describing two patents to the Food and Drug Administration, thereby causing plaintiffs to pay monopoly prices for the drug in violation of state-law analogs of the Sherman Act, the district court's dismissal of the complaint for failure to plausibly allege that the false descriptions caused the delay is: 1) affirmed in part to the extent plaintiffs' theory posits a delay in the marketing of generic alternatives to ACTOS by all the generic applicants other than Teva, where plaintiffs' theory presupposes that these applicants were aware of Takeda's allegedly false patent descriptions when they filed their applications, which is not supported by well-pleaded allegations and 2) vacated in part to the extent plaintiffs' theory as to Teva does not require any knowledge of the false patent descriptions, where plaintiffs plausibly alleged that Takeda delayed Teva’s market entry.
Keep Reading

Western Surety Co. v. La Cumbre Office

February 2, 2017
Corp. Governance, Contracts, Corporation & Enterprise Law
(California Court of Appeal) - In an action for breach of an indemnity agreement, the trial court's grant of summary judgment requiring defendant to pay plaintiff approximately $6.07 million pursuant to the indemnity agreement is affirmed where although the signatory did not have actual authority to execute the indemnity agreement on defendant's behalf, in these circumstances, the person's signature binds defendant pursuant to former Corporations Code section 17157(d) (now section 17703.01(d)), provided that the other party to the agreement does not have actual knowledge of the person's lack of authority to execute the agreement on behalf of defendant.
Keep Reading

Trikona Advisers Limited v. Chugh

January 18, 2017
Bankruptcy Law, Injury & Tort Law, Corporation & Enterprise Law, Corp. Governance
(California Court of Appeal) - In a complaint alleging breach of fiduciary duty by defendant, a former partner and fifty percent owner of plaintiff corporation, the district court's grant of summary judgment to defendants is affirmed over plaintiff's meritless arguments that: 1) the district court incorrectly applied the doctrine of collateral estoppel; and 2) Chapter 15 of the United States Bankruptcy Code prevents the district court from giving preclusive effect to the Cayman court’s factual findings.
Keep Reading

If no case summaries appear in this area, there are no new case summaries this week.
You are receiving this mailing because you subscribed as *|EMAIL| * to receive newsletters on FindLaw.com. FindLaw's case summaries are copyrighted material and are not intended for republication without prior approval. You may, however, freely redistribute this email in its entirety. 

Questions or concerns about our Newsletter layout or content? Contact us!

Our mailing address is: 800 West California Avenue 2nd Floor, Sunnyvale, CA 94086
Unsubscribe from this newsletter        Unsubscribe from all FindLaw newsletters

Copyright © 2017 FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.